2011 – Identification – editor La Lettre VoléeTRACING OF THE AND GLOBE
In 2009 in the Boondael Chapel, Jocelyne Coster’s exhibition… I see a 2 by 2meter white panel, on which are left, on their own, black hand and footprints… Strange… And of course I don’t “see”, I “fail to see”, I am literally flabbergasted… But this “Etape” (“Step”) as the artist calls it, holds me back, precisely because of that: because it blurs the vision and cuts the words!
After all, the largest part of an artist activity provokes nothing else than the discarding of usage and utility, not to shelter in transgression (modern dead end) even less to satisfy in parody (post-modern dead end), but for a different « sharing the senses in all meanings » according to Jacques Rancière. This tempting expression of an artistic creation could also quickly become a passe partout that could very well invert itself: to share differently even down to insensitivity. Because, if it is or is becoming other, then this sharing falls into out of common insensitivity. No other joint sharing without space from common representation! An imitation or a copy never gave a true account of a painting, figurative or not. The misunderstanding or shunning of work of arts will always come of the gap, the big gap between the desire to share and the desire to discover the non-shareable. Was it not the case of the cave paintings? To re-present only presents again by facing what escapes the representation necessarily always already recognized. All in all, does it not appear that painting, as well as any other worthy creative art, always represents the unrepresentable, ever made sensitive but the insensitive, never shared the unshared? Otherwise everything regresses to insignificance…
Let’s come back to Jocelyne Coster, to what sensitized us from the eve in this big white space hardly bordered by traces… But what of? Their impact gives us a new sensitivity sending to time and space: to do this she grasped the earth… What we shan’t discover at a glance. No more than a word alone painting is never it, we do not apprehend a painting or its impertinence without following the path of experimenting it. Her works swarm with warm technical plasticity affects us. But in what ways and to what issue?
Itinerary: tracking the earth
1985 and later: it all starts with silkscreens which use various methods: accelerations which lengthens the image, taken by acrylic on canvas cut-outs from the book of ephemeris of the navigator and titled by the same name, or coming from “Aller-retour en 9 escales” (“Round trip with 9 stops”), photographs taken in flight from behind a microlight and connected on canvas titled “Ascendance”, enlarged cartographic landscape images printed and overprinted, from the station of La Louvière to the islands of the Philippines going through Long Island or Cuba, printed on paper, glass, canvas, wood… The artist already reflects the uniqueness of her “moves” be they by herself – her travels are everywhere and always she stubbornly heads to capture views of height (we have seen that if necessary, she does not hesitate to rent an air vehicle) – or whether in her work: photography, enlargement, application, colour, superposition of plans succeed with equal obstinacy. It requires, every time, to capture the space and re-write rather large surfaces, between 1,50 and 2, sometimes even 3 meters, of coloured shapes that overlap and meander and stretch: and give the impression of a time of space.
.
Up to now, the recordings processed in multiple ways respect what they received, the views of land are certainly pretexts for transformed presentations, but they remain alone in question: of time tempered art space remains foremost space land, even in the form of a globe (the “Météosat” series of four boxes dated 1993 – but it should be noted that they are parallel to the birth and death of an infant) or a geographical map (that of “Eruption”) and nothing else. Even the Project for the Electrabel steam gas Tower on a tubular structure to bring out the bright spots offers the map of a city, Brussels, as the “Astrolabe” giant – screen printing on aluminium and stainless steel 5,50 meters high for the airport – peels the photos of the sky in spiral: “She peeled the earth like one peels an orange, says Chantal Talbot, the spiral of peel (the one with which one must make a wish) unfolds, opens and reveals its rings, its spaces empty and full”.
However, despite the brilliance of technical processes, the work retains a conceptual aspect – the commentators had already noticed – perhaps due to the photographic objectification in its receptiveness and repetitiveness Jocelyne Coster, precisely, does not stop there
Itinerary: track footprint
Because experience rocks – is it the real impact of birth and death that precipitates it? – heterogeneous elements burst into the work of the artist. In 1993, from random meetings with farmers in Jamaica, on landscapes photographs arise enlarged prints of the skin of her hand. Such fingerprints will therefore impose themselves, as in the silkscreen “Fayence” in 1997 where an enlarged thumb is overexposed. Similarly, in 1995, the “Solstice” series is crossed by newspaper articles dated June 21 or December 21 and selected by people of different nationalities.
The heterogeneous burst is none other than that of what is humane on earth!
But without any yield to pictorial reproduction; from land mapping to body impressions, unexpected analogy is therefore seen explored. To understand the impact, first of all let us rekindle our memory: an analogy is by no means a resemblance, it uses four different relative terms whose only relationship is identifiable by (A/B = C/D) or somewhat misused, refers to a common third one inverted between two unrelated elements (A/B = B/C)… And in 1998 and 1999, what the new silkscreens expand are finger or palm prints, immediately titrated with geographical terms: “Confluent”, “Fluvial”, “Océan Pacifique”, “Isola” and… Blues and Sienna, these acrylics on canvas have roughly the same dimensions as the previous large paintings, which further strengthens the analogy: the trace, the perceived brand! Voila: the painting of Jocelyne Coster has made us sensitive at what is always on move on earth, the furthest, as well as bodies, the closest – nature, wrote Whitehead, one of the leading Anglo-Saxon philosophers of the last century, is always “passage”. The passage imperceptible as such (from silhouettes of territories to fingerprints, both invisible to the common view – with its vision at the same time still and down to earth – including elusive light) has been given in sensitive sharing by setting cuts and coloured traces of paint. The importance of light transfigured by colour bursts then: the “Volare nel blù” series even offer a bluish coloration that invades the polyester film leaving barely drawn black and lightly golden marks who find themselves in the “Approach” series which, as taken during a landing (in the meantime, in 2001, “Take-off” series, footprint as of a taking-off), captures the mobility and the light at the same time. Painting does not imitate nature: it draws its colour and marks the footprint of the globe moving and bodies in evolution!
For what stake, finally? These recent years rush the possible answer by their exciting initiatives.
Geography of the skin and the earth are drawn in the same way (topography, dermography). Only a difference in scale between them. This report of similar structures between the infinitesimal and the infinitely large is found in all stages of life. What is very surprising in this graphic similarity is that we are born on this earth covered with a skin that is a reflection of geography we walk on (the skin on the earth) until the end of our lives, just when everything is reversed (the skin under the earth). And besides, do we not include the years on the earth’s geological, topographical curves and that of man in many of its lines and its folds?
Jocelyne Coster, “Le rapport graphique”, 1999
Itinerary: sharing tracks
“Coudée” (“Cubit”), “Empan” (“Span”), “Pied” (“Foot”): the exploration goes on, continues to surprise us, literally. It focuses on body parts, related to the measures before the invention of the meter, to constitute a self-portrait, for the least, a singular silkscreen printing on painted and varnished maple “3mains = 1 coudée autoportrait” (“3 hands = 1 cubit self-portrait”) shows a folding meter! But as precise it is, the fingerprinting never falls into a formality. In 2003, “Catastrophe annoncée” (“Announced disaster”) or “Adieu banquise” (“Farewell ice floe”) conjures up the rising waters in taking human footprint (the palm of the hand of the daughter of the artist reflects here). There is not even an analogy, but a common cause: if the large footprint through cartographic lines 155 x 150 cm is entitled “De Sienne à Outremer” (“From Sienna to Ultramarine”) it is to join the colour Sienna and Ultramarine blue, the members and the elements. Case heard: “Naître” (“Born”) on glass and wood, traces the cardiac monitoring of the child at birth approaching, red and dark blue swirl background, of a volcanic eruption. And its production entails the challenge to illustrate the four elements in twelve sequences from the foot of her daughter, Leila. Subsequently, five prints of her foot, between age 6 to 10, combined with wooden rulers or printed alone on a panel with white background or black on black…
No more than a formal withdrawal does it result in any individual dropping out.
Already encountered in the initial travels, the political dimension – in its original sense: the conditions of action that involves the existence in common, sharing – goes to the forefront in 2006. The occasion is given by the announcement of fingerprinting required at border crossings… “I am thus so caught up by the current reverse way, says Jocelyne Coster, because for several years I would send fingerprints back to geography and there they would ask them to travel around!” Her retort was not long standing; she decided to illustrate the “Article 13” of the Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and choice of residence within a State”. Duly noted.
Completed by the “Frontières” (“Borders”) series, the panels are brimming and overflowing marine blue and brown digital with a red line snaking care freely away from limits: open to infinity…
Jocelyne Coster, the itinerant wanderer
… and to “Mouvement perpétuel” (“Perpetual motion”), a wheel 2 meters in diameter with 84 gradients which represent the highest life expectancy on the planet, with a ring inscribed with the map portion of the northern hemisphere, place of this privilege: the “fun and educational object, says Vincent Cartuyvels, recalls the geography, the state of the planet and the north/south relations, it speaks of the human body, the golden number and perpetual motion”. It invites us to enter, including politically, in the footsteps of the world and the body!
In the Chapel of Boondael, mentioned at the beginning, this wheel stood in the middle of the room whilst on the walls and floors were exposed the tracks of hands and feet that had caused my shock or rather my initial divestiture…
… To discover the unknown is not a prerogative of Sinbad, of Eric the Red, or of Copernicus. Each and every man is a discoverer. He begins by discovering bitterness, saltiness, concavity, smoothness, harshness, the seven colours of the rainbow and the twenty-some letters of the alphabet; he goes on to visages, maps, animals and stars. He ends with doubt, or with faith, and the almost total certainty of his own ignorance…
Jorge-Luis Borgès and Maria Kodama, Atlas, transl. Anthony Kerrigan, London, E.P. Dutton, 1985.
Jocelyne Coster has never stopped and never ceases to screen print the traces that fit us in the world, as where already doing, since prehistoric ages, artists and shamans – two words that are applied to them in an anachronistic way – whose hand negatives we can still see on cavern walls. To strangeness is then added the emotion to receive such infinitely human and silent messages. With this contemporary work, strangeness, emotion, beget us again to receive in other ways the visible sharing of the unseen
Eric Clemens- - Philosopher